Skip to content

Imbalances

Beginner6 min read

Imbalances: why diagonal

POC and delta are global characteristics of the candle. Imbalances are local: they show at which specific level one side overwhelmed the other.

The principle: if aggressive buys at a level are several times greater than aggressive sells one level below, that is an ask-side imbalance. Buyers crushed the defense. If the opposite is true, it is a bid-side imbalance.

But why "one level below"? Why do we compare diagonally rather than horizontally?

image.png

The rule: if the ratio is >= 2x (200%) — it is an imbalance, one side is twice as strong. If >= 4x (400%) — it is a strong imbalance, outright domination. The 200% and 400% thresholds are standard; they can be adjusted for a specific instrument and timeframe if needed.

Let us check all levels of our candle. Hover over the highlighted cells — green at the top (buy imbalances) and red at the bottom (sell imbalances):

Sell imbalances:

Level (bid)Bidvs Ask (level above)RatioImbalance
5524.7585vs 24 (@ 5525.00)3.5x200%
5525.00310vs 75 (@ 5525.25)4.1x400%
5525.25240vs 295 (@ 5525.50)0.8xnone

Buy imbalances:

Level (ask)Askvs Bid (level below)RatioImbalance
5525.75340vs 110 (@ 5525.50)3.1x200%
5526.0052vs 18 (@ 5525.75)2.9x200%

Two clusters. At the bottom — sell imbalances: sellers dominated at 5524.75 and 5525.00. At the top — buy imbalances: buyers pressed at 5525.75 and 5526.00. The middle — no imbalances, an equilibrium zone.

The candle told its story in four numbers (OHLC). The footprint told it in twenty. And the story turned out to be more complex.

Quiz

1. Why are footprint imbalances compared diagonally (ask at level P vs bid at level P-1) rather than horizontally?

2. Footprint shows: ask @ 5525.75 = 340, bid @ 5525.50 = 110. Ratio 340/110 = 3.1x. How do you classify this?

3. In the middle of a footprint candle (5525.50-5525.25) there are no imbalances. What does this mean?

AI Assistant

Imbalances

How can I help?

Ask anything about this lesson